Comments for Screwlewse.com

Comment on Different CSS techniques and their performance by zomigi.com » Highly Maintainable, Efficient, and Optimized CSS

zomigi.com » Highly Maintainable, Efficient, and Optimized CSS — Tue, 31 Aug 2010 18:46:45 +0000

[...] Different CSS techniques and their performance [...]

Comment on Reply to “Best Clearfix Ever” post. by Stu

Stu — Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:39:52 +0000

My butt bears the teeth marks of overflow: hidden.

Comment on Reply to “Best Clearfix Ever” post. by Dave Gregory

Dave Gregory — Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:40:57 +0000

Agreed, that would be the most simple solution, I just worry about that biting me in the butt somewhere in my designs. Albiet this is the most simple solution and worthy of adding. I’ll update.

The content hack doesn’t actually have any possible issue with it. (at least that I know of)

I wonder very much about the use of the extra div is still used. That’s the worst possible solution.

Comment on Reply to “Best Clearfix Ever” post. by Nico Hagenburger

Nico Hagenburger — Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:00:42 +0000

Unless you need some overflow, this solution would be the most simple one:

article, aside, div, form, header, nav, section, ul { overflow: hidden }

But since every site I make is special, I would not set a default clearfix. A .clearfix div is the worst solution and I wonder why it’s still used very often.

Comment on Different CSS techniques and their performance by Dave Gregory

Dave Gregory — Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:12:52 +0000

Thanks! I’ll check that out for my next revision.
Yeah.. I would like to have more accurate measurements.. but then again, I find myself wondering if there are other areas that could use more time measuring performance.

Comment on Different CSS techniques and their performance by Performance of CSS Selectors | Silver Blog

Performance of CSS Selectors | Silver Blog — Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:39:29 +0000

[...] Direct Link to Article — Permalink [...]

Comment on Different CSS techniques and their performance by Lindsey Simon

Lindsey Simon — Tue, 17 Aug 2010 01:25:45 +0000

You might be able to make use of the Reflow Timer bookmarklet I have up on this page:
http://www.browserscope.org/reflow/about (look in the top right). You should be able to use that on IE too.
Essentially, the takeaway looks to be the same as what Steve saw too – a linear performance drop based on # of selectors. The same is also true, that the number of elements a selector matches and the level of DOM depth impacts performance (my finding is that those are linear too).

Comment on Different CSS techniques and their performance by Performance of CSS Selectors Ajax Help W3C Tag

Performance of CSS Selectors Ajax Help W3C Tag — Mon, 16 Aug 2010 07:43:11 +0000

[...] Direct Link to Article — Permalink « Market Research for Link Building – Who You Can Get Links From iPhone “slide to unlock” Text in WebKit/CSS3 » [...]

Comment on Loading your javascript files asynchronously by maczhou » ??????JavaScript??

maczhou » ??????JavaScript?? — Sun, 15 Aug 2010 11:37:37 +0000

[...] ???http://screwlewse.com/2010/06/loading-your-javascript-files-asynchronously/ [...]

Comment on Different CSS techniques and their performance by Jeffrey Bennett

Jeffrey Bennett — Sat, 14 Aug 2010 01:14:03 +0000

Oh yes! I meant to write “decrease page load time” instead of “increase page load time”. LOL! Good catch!